Welcome to my Moots page.
You will find here the moot-argument cases and moot-trial briefs that I drafted.
– Nilima Bhadbhade
By the way … … …
Welcome to my Moots page.
You will find here the moot-argument cases and moot-trial briefs that I drafted.
– Nilima Bhadbhade
Download printer-friendly versions: Click here
—
The Specific Relief (Amendment) Act 2018 has been passed by both Houses of Parliament after a brief discussion, but without debate. Like many other laws passed for enhancing business capabilities, this Amendment likely to be yet another instance of ‘legislate in haste, amend at leisure’.
The amending Act, it has been stated in both Houses of Parliament, has an objective to prevent errant contractors from breaking their contracts and hampering infrastructure projects. The ultimate aim of the Act is to enhance the standing of India in the ‘ease of doing business’ ranking. The discussion in the Houses centred around infrastructure contracts only. The entire discussion in both Houses has overlooked the fact that the same amendment, and the Specific Relief Act as amended, is not restricted to business contracts, but applies to the common man and his personal contracts.
Click here for printer-friendly version of article.
Click to read or download
the Specific Relief Act 1963 as amended in 2018
the Specific Relief Act 1963 as amended showing all changes.
—
After the Specific Relief (Amendment) Act 2018 comes into force on 1 October 2018, a plaintiff will not be able to seek compensation in substitution of specific performance.
If the Act has been amended to enable plaintiffs to seek confidently the relief of specific performance, this particular amendment will deter plaintiffs from seeking it. It is hoped that this particular amendment in Section 21(1) of the Act that takes away the right to seek compensation in substitution, and indeed many other amendments to the Act, do not become one more instance of ‘legislate in haste, amend at leisure’.
This change to section 21(1) was NOT recommended by the Expert Committee set up to suggest amendments to the Specific Relief Act.
The Specific Relief (Amendment) Act 2018 takes away the exceptional nature of the remedy of specific performance and injunctions. Section 10 of the Act makes it a general remedy.
The pre-amendment approach has historical and economical justifications. These are discussed in my article ‘Exceptional Nature of Specific Performance‘.
When the remedy of specific performance is exceptional in nature, the plaintiff, who is already aggrieved by the breach, must prove his entitlement: that compensation is either unascertainable or is inadequate. When specific performance is available to any person who seeks it, the plaintiff is saved of this burden, and the defendant who has broken the contract must show why plaintiff should not get this relief.
It is not expected that litigation will increase because of this amendment, or that the proportion of suits of specific performance will rise.
The true purpose of the amendment is to deter breaches and encourage performance.
Click here to read more.
The Specific Relief (Amendment) Act 2018 changes the features of contract remedies. The important provisions relating to contract remedies are as follows:
Click to read or download
the Specific Relief Act 1963 (as amended in 2018)(SRA 1963)
the Specific Relief Act 1963 as amended showing all changes.
Specific performance is now a general remedy in Indian law. It is no longer exceptional, or discretionary. Read more.
Click here to read my article: Exceptional Nature of Specific Performance.
The Specific Relief Act 1963 has been amended in 2018. The amendment makes far-reaching changes in the law. Click here to read and download the Acts.